2015-06-11 7:05 GMT+02:00 Paul DeBruicker <pdebr...@gmail.com>: > Hi Doru, > > By "the old version of Spotter" I meant whatever was in Pharo 3 that would > produce a list of search results with exact matches at the top when I'd hit > shift+enter and then type e.g. 'accept.' Sorry to have said "Pharo 4" & > been unnecessarily confusing. >
I miss spotlight for this fast accurate search too. It is much easier to type a message (like accept) and hit enter and you get a MessageList/Browser with that result. Instead, in spotter, you have to - scroll through the list of all other search results (like classes) - dive in the list of all implementors - scroll again and no easy way to open a message list with all implementors. But: It is MUCH easier to configure or extent Spotter (if you understand the badly documented concepts behind). Spotter is not a perfect replacement for Spotlight, but spotlight wasn't perfect/accurate too. For example, search for String and you got all possible classes or methods with String in its name but NOT the class String itself, (not even if you scroll down, because the search result includes only 100 entries). There are often symbols in the resultlist that aren't messages at all and if you select that result you get "There are no imiplementors of ..." this annoyed me a lot. I fixed some of the problems with spotlight but doing this for spottter is much cleaner and easier. > > > I'm just going to use 'accept' for this example but why show the mixed list > of 637 implementors of accept* and not lead with "accept". Why was it > decided that inexact matches to the typed input be privileged above exact > matches in the new tool? Is it a bad Levenshtein distance algorithm or > something? > "Why was it decided that ..." no decision, it was implemented successive to catch up with old spotlight. missing features were added afterwards (like search for globals and class vars) any missing feauter ? -> open an issue ( and or contribute a fix) > > > Thanks for helping me figure it out > > > Paul > > > > > > Tudor Girba-2 wrote > > Hi, > > > > What do you mean by the old version of Spotter? > > > > Just in case: you should know that Spotter is made to be extensible. This > > means that if you want to play with your own way of searching for > objects, > > you can just do it. Let me know if you to try and if you need help in > this > > direction. > > > > Cheers, > > Doru > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Paul DeBruicker < > > > pdebruic@ > > > > wrote: > > > >> > >> Is there any way to change back to the old version of Spotter in Pharo > 4? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Nicolai Hess wrote > >> > 2015-06-10 16:24 GMT+02:00 Paul DeBruicker < > >> > >> > pdebruic@ > >> > >> > >: > >> > > >> >> So by default the search tool is only guaranteed to return an exact > >> term > >> >> match if there are only less than 5 non-exact match results? > >> >> > >> >> > >> > Yes > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Nicolai Hess wrote > >> >> > 2015-06-10 7:39 GMT+02:00 Paul DeBruicker < > >> >> > >> >> > pdebruic@ > >> >> > >> >> > >: > >> >> > > >> >> >> when I hit shift+enter and type 'accept' I get things that are not > >> >> >> #accept, e.g. #accept: and AbstractAcceptor. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> If I add a space after accept it doesn't help. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> What do I not understand? > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > the result list is not sorted and the result list is built by all > >> >> methods > >> >> > having the query string as part > >> >> > of its selector name. > >> >> > > >> >> > Yes this can be improved and it is not difficult, for example you > >> can > >> >> add > >> >> > this method to > >> >> > > >> >> > GTFilterImplementor>>applyFilterWithQuery > >> >> > super applyFilterWithQuery. > >> >> > items sort: [ :a :b | (self itemFilterNameFor: a) size < (self > >> >> > itemFilterNameFor: b) size ] > >> >> > > >> >> > this will sort the result list by the size of the selector name. > So, > >> if > >> >> > there is a perfect match, > >> >> > it will be listed first. > >> >> > (BUT only in the implementors category if you "dive-in", not in the > >> >> > 5-elements-result-preview-list). > >> >> > > >> >> > Maybe there is a better way without sorting. (We can modify > >> >> > applyFilterWithQuery for the implementors > >> >> > filter, to put perfect matches at the begining of the list). > >> >> > > >> >> > But all this is not easy to discover. Spotter classes make some > >> heavy > >> >> use > >> >> > of delegation, many operations > >> >> > are split and delgated to subclasses (GOOD!) > >> >> > many classes aren't documented (BAD!) and this makes it really > >> >> difficult > >> >> > to > >> >> > catch how all this is supposed to work together. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > nicolai > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Thanks > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Paul > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> View this message in context: > >> >> > >> > http://forum.world.st/Using-GTSpotter-how-do-I-find-an-implementor-of-accept-tp4831299p4831428.html > >> >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at > >> Nabble.com. > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://forum.world.st/Using-GTSpotter-how-do-I-find-an-implementor-of-accept-tp4831299p4831506.html > >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > www.tudorgirba.com > > > > "Every thing has its own flow" > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Using-GTSpotter-how-do-I-find-an-implementor-of-accept-tp4831299p4831566.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
