Good that it works now, maybe your problem is that /ws-echo comes before and
maybe also matches /ws-echo-client ? But I am no nginx expert.
Maybe you try serving and proxying it as /client-ws-echo ? Or switch the order ?
> On 06 May 2015, at 20:11, itli...@schrievkrom.de wrote:
>
> Ok, I managed to make it work somehow:
>
> I removed the static file serving from Pharo and put the
> "ws-echo-client" code to the file system and it is now handled by nginx.
>
> Now only WebSocket stuff is done by Pharo and this seems to work without
> problems.
>
> That means: the mixture of static-stuff and websocket handling breaks
> the system: browser (Firefox or Chrome or IE11) <-> nginx <-> Pharo
>
> Not the solution I wanted, but at least a way to make WebSockets working
> under Pharo ...
>
> Marten
>
>
>
> Am 06.05.2015 um 16:48 schrieb itli...@schrievkrom.de:
>> Hmm, at least I managed, that Pharo answered every second request using
>> the echo example
>>
>> Under Windows and nginx I added to the nginx configuration. My local
>> Pharo server is running under 127.0.0.1:40000:
>>
>> extract from nginx.conf:
>>
>> http:{
>>
>> map $http_upgrade $connection_upgrade {
>> default upgrade;
>> }
>>
>> server {
>>
>> location /ws-echo {
>> proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:40000/ws-echo ;
>> proxy_http_version 1.1;
>> proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade;
>> proxy_set_header Connection $connection_upgrade;
>> }
>> location /ws-echo-client {
>> proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:40000/ws-echo-client ;
>> }
>>
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 06.05.2015 um 10:20 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe:
>>> Marten,
>>>
>>>> On 06 May 2015, at 10:15, itli...@schrievkrom.de wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I'm playing with WebSockets under Pharo4 and this works as expected -
>>>> when using Pharo4 alone (using the Zinc packages).
>>>>
>>>> But I did not get it to work, when e.g. doing a proxying via nginx (I
>>>> did not check it with Apache).
>>>>
>>>> Actually Pharo4 seems to receive some stuff, because the WebSocket of
>>>> Pharo4 stuff does not work as expected after first proxying attempts.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone experience with that ?
>>>>
>>>> Marten
>>>
>>> Proxying the WebSockets protocol is not easy, nor implemented everywhere,
>>> like HTTP is. This makes sense if you think about it, a WebSocket
>>> connection is a permanent connection, which takes resources, this is not
>>> something most servers like.
>>>
>>> So it is more difficult.
>>>
>>> Did you see/try http://nginx.org/en/docs/http/websocket.html ?
>>>
>>> (I did not try it)
>>>
>>> Sven
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Marten Feldtmann
>
