> On 01 May 2015, at 12:45, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymc...@me.com> wrote:
>
> One question, is someone working this kind of metadata management? Because
> 1) instead of keeping it in the class, we can keep it in objects.
> 2) It can be serialized into STON for git versioning and probably it can be
> stored in some way in Monticello
>
I don’t like in general to have data in methods…
For Monticello, we really should add file storage.
it’s easy
-> add ivar to RPackage
-> annualise it lazily with an in-Memory filesystem
-> on MC save, copy the files into a “resources” subdirectory of the zip file.
-> on load, just load the files from the “resources” subdirectory into the
in-memory
filesystem.
-> add a tool to add files to the in memory filesystem. The best here would be
to add support to GTInspector to copy files —> DONE.
Marcus
