That’s why it’s not in production :).

Thank you for the feedback 

> On 25 Apr 2015, at 11:54, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Excellent!
> 
> I'm also noticing that this doesn't use the CriticBrowser's Manifest class, 
> but I assume this is already somewhere on your todo list. (I'm not very fond 
> of the pragma usage here, it would be nice to have it as metadata (in a 
> possibly separate window which I can't open/close on demand)).
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymc...@me.com 
> <mailto:yuriy.tymc...@me.com>> wrote:
> Hi Peter.
> 
> For now - no, but you can check a prototype if you load QualityAssistant with:
> 
>     Metacello new
>       baseline: #QualityAssistant;
>       repository: 'github://Uko/QualityAssistant:development';
>       load
> 
> Want to make a whole new philosophy of how do you tell which parts should be 
> checked with which rules. So in future you’ll be able to tell on the level of 
> a package, class or method which rules do you want to run and which rules do 
> you want to skip, or which parameters (number of methods in a class) should a 
> rule use when it checks your entities.
> 
> For now you can skip rule on the level of class or method. When you do this a 
> specific code is written down in the class or method, so if the other 
> developer will read your code he can also se the you’ve skipped the rule on 
> porpoise and it’s a planned decision.
> 
> Cheers!
> Uko
> 
> > On 25 Apr 2015, at 09:50, Peter Uhnák <i.uh...@gmail.com 
> > <mailto:i.uh...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there a simple way to add certain rule as ignored? Something like "right 
> > click -> supress rule"
> > I am working on tools that do use metaprogramming, so it tends to complain, 
> > and for example in roassal there is a common pattern
> > element := RTBox new size: 50; elementOn: 'sth'.
> > But that of course complains about missing "; yourself". Of course I could 
> > break it into two statements but that is counter-productive.
> > So it would be nice if I could with a simple click ignore certain rules.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Peter
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to