Hi, that's because you need to pass a block, since you want to postpone to execution. i.e. false and: [Transcript open]. (otherwise the binary operation Transcript open will take precedence over keyword false and:) You can always look at the implementation of those things — I always learn something from it. :)
»and: alternativeBlock« Peter On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Jan B. <blizn...@fit.cvut.cz> wrote: > Hello > > I would like to ask how to do non-evaluating and. > As far as I know, & should be evaluating and and: should be non-evaluating. > However, I need to find a way how to use it properly. > > In "conventional" languages I would expect to work it like in following > example... > false and: Transcript open > Since false is... false... there is no reason to evaluate Transcript open. > But when I run this one in playground, transcript opens. > > Any help is appreciated. > > Jan > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Non-evaluating-and-or-tp4817211.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
