> On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:40, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 22/3/15 22:05, Sven Van Caekenberghe a écrit :
>>> On 22 Mar 2015, at 21:44, Denis Kudriashov <dionisi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> It is another perfect task for XStreams:
>>>
>>> r := #('a12' 'b12' 'a13' 'a14' 'c23' 'a16') reading selecting: [:each |
>>> each first = $a].
>>> r get > a12
>>> r get > a13
>> Beautiful !
>
> Yes but with
> r next.
> r next
The choice for different selector names was intentional, by design. To avoid
confusion, because #next and #get are not 100% identical (semantically). This
is an important point.
> I was reading the XTreams API recently but this is forbidden for me to open
> another project before finishing
> what I started. Now if somebody else would like to help pushing Xtreams in
> Pharo 50.
> :)
Well, it does/did load OK in Pharo 3 and probably will in 4 too.
https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/Xtreams/
>>
>> Thx Denis.
>>
>>> 2015-03-22 20:47 GMT+03:00 stepharo <steph...@free.fr>:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I need a collection that does the following:
>>>
>>> col := #('a12' 'b12' 'a13' 'a14' 'c23' 'a16') asMyNewCollection.
>>> col findFirst: [:each | each first = $a]
>>> > a12
>>> col findFirst: [:each | each first = $a]
>>> > a13
>>>
>>> Do you know a collection that would work?
>>> So I have the impression that such behavoir could be defined with a kind of
>>> methods wrapper.
>>>
>>> Stef
