Hi Stef,
with Nicolai, we considered it would be nice to have everything (groups
and scoping) based on RBEnvironments... And that we needed a way, for
interactive use, to have 'live' or 'auto-updating' RBEnvironments (but
maybe an environment used during a mass refactoring shouldn't be live
however, to avoid recursion effects).
Groups as kind of meta-packages... Interesting, as long as it doesn't
uses the dependency mechanism of MC.
Can we consider having also Ring objects to represent all this (group of
packages, protocols)?
Thierry
Le 22/03/2015 11:00, stepharo a écrit :
Hi
I'm analysing the behavior of groups in nautilus.
- Add group works well.
This is really cool to be able to promote a package in the top focus
list.
The problem is that the group is not polymorph to a package so we
cannot publish.... but for now this should be ok.
-2 Now
Add as Groups & Browse
does not work for me since it open a browser that only contains the
groups but the refresh ... does not work.
Then this is strange because after we can still find a class that
is not in the original package.
- 3 Now
Add Matching ... could work if ask for a pattern and stop to browse
(cf above).
- 4 Add in group does not propose the currently available groups (only
Work)
- merge groups
-> raises a DNU
So I will remove 2 and implement 3
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/default.asp?15202
Stef
