the method from l'Ecuyer is already used in the texas instruments graphic calculators. But they don't seem to have patented it (I don't know how to check that).


Anyway I agree to have more RNGs which can be useful for statistics simulations or kryptography. And I would like to know how one can play with the bacteria ;-)
:) I will tell him.


Alain

PS did anyone receive the mail that I sent yesterday about syllogisms?

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckw...@gmail.com <mailto:serge.stinckw...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:36 PM, stepharo <steph...@free.fr
    <mailto:steph...@free.fr>> wrote:
    > Hi guys
    >
    > Konstantin who is a biologist developed for a "bacteria" eating
    monster
    > simulation system, two new random number generators.
    > I think that this is great because we need more random generators :)
    >
    > - Combined Random Number Generator is based on the algorithm
    described by
    > PIERRE L'ECUYER in "Efficient and Portable Combined Random Number
    > Generators" [Communications of the ACM, June 19, Volume 31,
    Number 6, pp.
    > 742-749, references p.774].
    >
    > - ExpInvConGen is an explicit inversive congruential generator,
    constructed
    > according to "Good random number generators are (not so) easy to
    find" by P.
    > Hellekalek (1998) and extended euclidean algorithm.
    >
    > I plan to package them and publish them in SciTalk with their own
    > configuration. But I wanted to know what you think.

    Great !

    Maybe better to integrate them in Sci-talk with the existing Random
    Number Generator (RNG). We have already 5 RNGs.
    I'm working on refactoring the RNG and distributions in Sci-Talk,
    because there is some redundancy until now:
    https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/scismalltalk/zXEyeGvTmJk
    <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21topic/scismalltalk/zXEyeGvTmJk>

    Regards,

    --
    Serge Stinckwich
    UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
    Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
    http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/



Reply via email to