> On 13 Mar 2015, at 20:36, stepharo <steph...@free.fr> wrote: > >>> Am 13.03.2015 um 14:51 schrieb Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> As one of the authors of Tide, I wouldn’t recommend to use it today… unless >>> you are planning to maintain it too, because atm I do not have time to do >>> it and Nico (the other/main author is not working on smalltalk anymore… nor >>> amber or pharo). >>> Instead, I would use Seaside+Reef :P >>> >> Is Reef better maintained than Tide? :P > > Yes and we should get a documentation.
Yes :P here is the thing: I have far too many children/projects so I decided to keep maintaining just two… and I picked the two I think are contributions more important to community: Voyage and Reef. Also they have the advantage (for me) of being 100% Pharo (for me, this is a big constraint to work on Tide right now: I do not have time to keep the track if two communities). All other projects (Mars, Storm, etc.) will sleep until… well, until someday I have insomnia and I want to work on something different :) Esteban >> >> Norbert >> >>> Esteban >>> >>>> On 12 Mar 2015, at 15:27, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote: >>>> >>>> For an upcoming project I'm thinking about what technology to use. I think >>>> it will be seaside or amber+tide. For the latter I would like to have some >>>> experience reports. >>>> >>>> Is anyone of you using tide and what is your experience with it? >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> >>>> Norbert >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > >
