But I like the idea of doru to have separate configurations less
complexity and mess to manage.
Le 7/3/15 12:59, Torsten Bergmann a écrit :
Why another config? We have groups in the config. So one can load the
core or tools.
Bye
T.
Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com>schrieb:
Ok. I will add a dependency from Pillar-Pharo-Tools to PetitParser
core.
Actually, I would rather prefer to create a separate
ConfigurationOfPillarTools that adds the Pillar-Pharo-Tools and
the PetitParser dependency. What that be Ok?
Cheers,
Doru
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Damien
Cassou<damien.cas...@gmail.com <mailto:damien.cas...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
On Mar 6, 2015 1:25 AM, "Tudor Girba" <tu...@tudorgirba.com
<mailto:tu...@tudorgirba.com>> wrote:
> - now that the inspector and spotter are part of Pharo, we
can move these extensions directly into Pillar. The only
problem is that this syntax highlighting is based on
PetitParser, so we would have to add a dependency from Pillar
to PetitParser. What do you think?
Please don't make pillar core depend on petitparser (except if
main pillar parser is rewritten in petitparser :-)). I have no
problem having petitparser as a dependency of
pillar-pharo-tools though.
--
www.tudorgirba.com <http://www.tudorgirba.com>
"Every thing has its own flow"
