> On 13 Feb 2015, at 18:47, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 13 Feb 2015, at 18:29, Johan Fabry <jfa...@dcc.uchile.cl> wrote: >> >> >> If we think about renaming things in Spec, actually I’d rename: >> - ComposableModel to ComposableUI >> - all the protocols ‘protocol-*’ to ‘API-*’ > > +100 > I’m super tired of “protocol” category (it is actually a protocol… as any > other category under the “protocol” pane :P) > api is a lot better
I am pro too, but it does influence the docs a bit, ... >> >>> On Feb 13, 2015, at 14:58, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> wrote: >>> >>> So should we really rename ComposableModel to ComposableUIModel ? (And >>> before Spec becomes more widely used?) >> >> >> >> ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- >> >> Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry >> PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile >> >
