On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> no. > in the best case it will be in pharo4 as preview. > (to remove/disable the old mechanism is going to take more time and > complications…) > Isn't that what I said? :) Since both are tools selected from the method, they would really be on equal footing wrt priority. cheers -ben > > On 12 Feb 2015, at 18:07, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> wrote: > > So is the plan to integrate Epicea for Pharo 4 Release as the default > mechanism, and leave removal of the existing mechanism until Pharo 5? > cheers -ben > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> > wrote: > >> >> > On 12 Feb 2015, at 17:36, Ben Coman <b...@openinworld.com> wrote: >> > >> > Is Epicea able to run parallel with the exiting changes framework, do >> we have to rip the latter out first? >> >> I works in parallel now. The idea is to remove the other mechanism in a >> second step. >> >> Marcus >> >> >> > >
