Re: [Pharo-users] "Improper store into indexable object" and weird variable names

[Davide Varvello via Pharo-users]

--- Begin Message ---

Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote
>> On 20 Jan 2015, at 10:00, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users <

> pharo-users@.pharo

> > wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Date: 20 Jan 2015 09:56:45 CET
>> From: Davide Varvello <

> varvello@

> >
>> To: 

> pharo-users@.pharo

>> Subject: Re: "Improper store into indexable object" and weird variable
>> names
>> 
>> 
>> Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 wrote
>>>> On 19 Jan 2015, at 22:46, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users <
>> 
>>> pharo-users@.pharo
>> 
>>> > wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Date: 19 Jan 2015 22:43:13 CET
>>>> From: Davide Varvello <
>> 
>>> varvello@
>> 
>>> >
>>>> To: 
>> 
>>> pharo-users@.pharo
>> 
>>>> Subject: Re: "Improper store into indexable object" and weird variable
>>>> names
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> H Sven,
>>>> I didn't move nor rename any of them. In fact some methods have t1, t2,
>>>> t3,
>>>> ... but some others have real variable names.
>>> 
>>> That is weird. Any details on which work and which do not ? System code
>>> or
>>> your code ?
>> 
>> Both, my code and system code. Looking at changes it seems it lost all
>> code
>> before 7:01:06 pm CET of yesterday (see http://imgur.com/V8eis9Z), I can
>> try
>> to restore from my backup, but I'm wondering what happened.
> 
> It has been years that I developed in 2.0, but I very vaguely remember
> having seen something similar. Going back and recovering from backup seems
> the only choice.
> 
> I find it hard to believe that, say some Collection methods are OK, and
> some say String methods are decompiled, and some of your own code is OK
> and some is not - totally arbitrary ? Is it even constant ?

It's weird. Look at here: http://i.imgur.com/p5kbECh.png

Davide



--
View this message in context: 
http://forum.world.st/Improper-store-into-indexable-object-and-weird-variable-names-tp4800514p4800625.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--- End Message ---