but if you omit the space between - and 3 the old compiler understands
it too, hence its just a convenience thing that cant lead to
misunderstandings, or?
btw opal also understands this:
- 3@2. --> (-3@2)
i mean, its obvious nevertheless that "-" is not a method like negated,
but part of a number and opal is just a bit more flexible with number
formatting.
werner
On 11/08/2014 04:40 PM, Nicolai Hess wrote:
Old compiler refuses to accept this code:
- 4 @ -5
^-- nothing more expected
Opal compiler does just fine:
- 4 @ -5 -> (-4@ -5)
who is right?
