On 09 Apr 2014, at 20:54, itli...@schrievkrom.de wrote: > And now the additional information: I'm working under Gemstone and I > noticed quite some differences between Pharo and its Gemstone port > of Zinc in this area ... I have to take a closer look here. > > Marten
I already expected that much. Yes, Zinc on Gemstone is seriously behind the original. Furthermore, I have never seen or worked with it. And although I have some sympathy for other Smalltalk implementations out there, I find it difficult to give free support for an expensive, closed source, commercial product. Sven
