Thanks guys! On Apr 7, 2014 4:36 PM, "Camille Teruel" <camille.ter...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 7 avr. 2014, at 16:31, Clément Bera <bera.clem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > I do not like 'Smalltalk evaluate:' either. > > One solution is to do 'self class compiler evaluate:'. > > > Yes IMO, calling #compiler on a class is the best solution since it > returns a compiler with the options that the class defines. > > > > > 2014-04-07 5:02 GMT-07:00 Sergi Reyner <sergi.rey...@gmail.com>: > >> 2014-04-07 11:51 GMT+01:00 Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr>: >> >> In 4.0, we will remove the old compiler and then we can see how to make >>> the API perfect. >>> >> >> Will it be able to decompile by then? >> > > I believe we cannot remove the old compiler if we do not provide something > to access the method's sources. > > It will have either a decompiler or in-image sources if we achieve to > compress them enough (recently a guy compressed the AST in 15Mb by sharing > nodes, which is half the size of the sources). > > >> >> Cheers, >> Sergi >> > > >
