bravo ! Btw, anybody with in-RAM Puppy Linux on an Atom netbook other than me ? Mine is for my own Japanese-lang training app's to be a bit portable, but not Android or Win8.
It can be tricky to get other languages in place on Puppy-in-RAM ... ( it takes about that 1 min to boot and then to setup a language environment that will survive, in my experience - a few single clicks at least) ... a small Pharo in that world would be great if the changes on device shutdown were written out auto-minimalistically ... but perhaps not as a those-sources-changes-are-one-big-file as that file sits out on an SD card at shutdown and probably must reload at boot/startup. Tiny executables still seem the way to go in Puppy ... but I am running one interpreter (Curl RTE) ad hoc. BUT ... it takes me much more time on my CentOS virtual server to set up node.js + selected HTTP server for a task via PUTTY and even more time to configure -a- Python version/enviro for some simple environment-sensitive scripting task ;-) And I don't think its just a matter of my 'nix shell scripting ! Android on x86 Atom is fun in its way for a few app's, but Puppy Linux in RAM - gotta love it ! On 27 February 2014 10:50, Sven Van Caekenberghe <s...@stfx.eu> wrote: > Pharo 3.0 on Ubuntu 13.10 > > The hacker experience: using ZeroConf to get Pharo 3.0 up and running in a > blank Ubuntu 13.10 (32-bit) account in 1 minute flat. Doing some HTTP > hacking in the next 5 minutes. Includes terminal headless execution as well. > > Please note that there are alternative ways to install and run Pharo [ > http://www.pharo.org ]. > > Sven > > -- > Sven Van Caekenberghe > Proudly supporting Pharo > http://pharo.org > http://association.pharo.org > http://consortium.pharo.org > > > > > >
