Just to motivate the browser example: we did try to find a different example but it's not so easy. If you want an application example, you need to explain the application and its' needs. The advantage of the browser is that you do not need to explain it. Also the browser has all the elements that you want to show in a simple example, including the reuse of models. Moreover this is without needing to provide (and explain) a bunch of application-specific code.
If you have an example that shows the same things than what we have now, taking into account the above requirements, and ending up at approx the same number of pages I would be most happy to write it up! On Feb 18, 2014, at 4:03 PM, kmo <vox...@gmail.com> wrote: > Spec can only get better and more complete as time goes on. I'm sure the > effort will be turn out to be worthwhile. > > I'm just a bit disappointed that stuff like a menu widget is missing. It's > not difficult to surmise what an application developer might want - there's > probably less than a dozen basic widgets in a typical interface. Spec needs > to have these covered. But is anyone even thinking of pharo for application > developers? The Spec examples say it all - browsers, browsers, and more > browsers - never anything that looks like an app. > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Spec-and-an-application-menu-tp4744164p4744702.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ---> Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org <--- Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry PLEIAD lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile
