2013/11/7 Benjamin <benjamin.vanryseghem.ph...@gmail.com> > Just a general remark: you should try as much as possible to avoid hard > coding width/height :) > > there are some methods on ComposableModel you could use like buttonHeight > toolbarHeight etc. that you should use instead :) > > > Ben > > On 07 Nov 2013, at 13:22, Bahman Movaqar <bah...@bahmanm.com> wrote: > > On 11/07/2013 12:45, Clément Bera wrote: > > Hey, > > I don't know what you want exactly. > > You can do: > > spec > <spec> > ^ SpecLayout composed > newRow: [:row | > row > newColumn: [ :col | > col > add: #list width: 135; > add: #description ] ]; > yourself > > and nest that as many times as you want (but I don't know if this was > your question). > > > I just tried this one and it works (see the code below) BUT, the code is > so hard to read and understand just for 3 rows and 7 widgets! > > <code> > defaultSpec > ^ SpecLayout composed > newColumn: [ :mainColumn | > mainColumn > newRow: [ :nameRow | > nameRow > add: #labelName; > add: #textName ] > height: 25. > mainColumn > newRow: [ :titleRow | > titleRow > add: #labelTitle; > newRow: [ :titleRadioRow | > titleRadioRow > add: #radioMr; > add: #radioMrs; > add: #radioMs ] ] > height: 25. > mainColumn newRow: [ :buttonRow | buttonRow add: > #buttonGreet ] height: 25 ]; > yourself > </code> > > Am I doing it right? > > I guess this is right. But I think you need to generate this layout out of collections, not to write it.
>
>
> Another feature is:
>
> debuggerSpec
> <spec: #default>
> ^ SpecLayout composed
> add: #inspector withSpec: #debuggerSpec;
> yourself
>
> #inspector being the instance variable name that holds a subclass of
> ComposableModel that defines class side #debuggerSpec, which answers a
> SpecLayout.
>
>
> Does this mean that for every table cell I have to create a new class?
>
> Yeah well I was just pointing out all the choices you had. Depending on
what you want to do you could have a class hierarchy similar to this:
SpecTable
AbstractSpecColumn
SpecColumnA
SpecColumnB
AbstractSpecCell
SpecCellA
SpecCellB
SpecTable having column, column having cells.
But this may not be the best choice.
Now that you caught my interest, I tried to do a table. I put it in
attachment the result. It is a .st file, so drag and drop it in your image,
then click file in entire file. Then try to run 'SpecTable new', it opens a
table with 3 columns and 5 rows, with no complex layout method. All the
code is in SpecTable (Cmd+f,Cmd+c to find a class in nautilus or write the
class name in workspace then select it and press Cmd+m), in the method
protocol table logic. It's like 6 methods.
However:
- vertical splitters are not sync.
- I don't know how to color the border of each cell to make it beautiful.
Of course you need to polish it ...
I hope it helped you :)
> Not sure if this helped.
>
> All of these questions are for your tutorials ?
>
>
>
>
> 2013/11/7 Bahman Movaqar <bah...@bahmanm.com>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is it possible to nest layouts in Spec? For example can I combine
>> `SpecColumnLayout` and `SpecRowLayout` together?
>>
>>
> --
> Bahman Movaqar (http://BahmanM.com <http://bahmanm.com/>)
>
> ERP Evaluation, Implementation & Deployment Consultant
> PGP Key ID: 0x6AB5BD68 (keyserver2.pgp.com)
> --
> Bahman Movaqar (http://BahmanM.com <http://bahmanm.com/>)
>
> ERP Evaluation, Implementation & Deployment Consultant
> PGP Key ID: 0x6AB5BD68 (keyserver2.pgp.com)
>
>
>
SpecTable.st
Description: Binary data
