I am not sure I understand. Why is this question relevant for the present 
discussion?

Doru


On Sep 26, 2013, at 7:36 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymc...@me.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> so what are we going to do with 'asEnglishPlural' missing from the ByteString?
> 
> Uko
> 
> On 26 вер. 2013, at 09:52, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> 
>> Strange. I've never encountered this.
>> 
>> each should be a MCWorkingCopy.
>> 
>> I will try to take a look, but it might take a while.
>> 
>> In the meantime, can you locate the package in your configuration? Is it 
>> possible that something went wrong with Monticello?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Doru
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Stéphane Ducasse 
>> <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote:
>> this is strange since I could snapshot moose and synectique using it. 
>> 
>> I'm about to write a boring report so I'm not allowed to open Pharo right 
>> now.
>> 
>>> I am giving a shot at Snapshotcello since it looks like a superb solution 
>>> for creating images properly from a complex configuration.
>>> 
>>> From 
>>> http://www.tudorgirba.com/blog/snapshotcello-take-a-snapshot-when-you-re-ready,
>>>  I tried to craft a call for my configuration.
>>> 
>>> I've loaded ConfigurationOfSnapshotcello #development in Pharo20.
>>> 
>>> Then tried the calls and there were some API changes (from the tests, I 
>>> found out the incantation).
>>> 
>>> Snapshotcello new
>>>     configurationClass: ConfigurationOfHOWebStack;
>>>     sourceVersion: #development;
>>>     targetVersion: '0.3-snapshot';
>>>     snapshot.       
>>> 
>>> But then I faced a problem with a DNU on 'asEnglishPlural' for a 
>>> categorization. No big deal, I commented that out as I could live with that.
>>> 
>>> But then I faced something more difficult (the 
>>> compileSnapshotWithCurrentPackages: aNumber worked in the self 
>>> generateSnapshotWithCurrentPackages: aNumber...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It took a lot of time to get the whole config loaded... (so, the 
>>> progressbars worked and worked)
>>> 
>>> Then, it failed on giving: "PostMortem: MNU: nil>>ancestry"
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> self workingCopiesFromConfiguration do: [ :each | 
>>>                     codeStream tab; tab; 
>>>                             nextPutAll: '#(';
>>>                                     nextPut: $'; 
>>>                                             nextPutAll: 
>>> each ancestry ancestorString
>>> ;
>>>                                             nextPutAll: '.mcz';
>>>                                     nextPut: $';
>>>                                     nextPutAll: '  ';
>>>                                     nextPut: $';
>>>                                             nextPutAll: (self 
>>> repositoryNameForWorkingCopy: each);
>>>                                     nextPut: $';
>>>                                     nextPutAll: '  ';
>>>                                     nextPut: $';
>>>                                             nextPutAll: each package name;
>>>                                     nextPut: $';
>>>                             nextPutAll: ' ) ' ]
>>>             separatedBy: [ codeStream cr ].
>>>     codeStream
>>>             cr;
>>>             tab;
>>>             nextPutAll: ')'.
>>>     ^ codeStream contents
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Oops. each is nil... 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Anyone having faced that?
>>> 
>>> Debugging...
>>> 
>>> Phil
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> www.tudorgirba.com
>> 
>> "Every thing has its own flow"
> 

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Obvious things are difficult to teach."




Reply via email to