Esteban, Mariano,
thanks for helping out. It's probably a lack of knowledge on my side, but
until now, everything I tried failed.
There seems to ben no package openssl098e.i686in the sources of Fedora 18,
so I downmoaded it, and opened it with yumex. The answer was that there was
nothing to do for libssl.
I tried to create a symbolic link to
/opt/Adobe/Reader9/Reader/intellinux/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8, after installing
a package that contained the library in question, but to no avail. With ldd
I found:
[edwin@ottopedi bin]$ ldd libSqueakSSL.so
*./libSqueakSSL.so: /lib/libssl.so.0.9.8: no version information available
(required by ./libSqueakSSL.so)*
linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00795000)
libssl.so.0.9.8 => /lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0x001e3000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0085c000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 (0x0035d000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00b13000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4ed07000)
libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x00c9c000)
I even tried to install from source, but I only managed to create libssl.a,
a static library.
For now, I'll postpone the tests for the sending of emails with Pharo to a
later date.
Thanks a lot,
E. Ancaer
2013/8/5 Mariano Martinez Peck <marianop...@gmail.com>
> Hi Edwin.
>
> I wrote some details on how to install Pharo in CentOS for a client. I
> paste them here in case it may help you:
>
> ---------------------------
>
>
> Installing Pharo in CentOS is not difficult. However, it does require some
> packages and dependencies. Pharo will only work with 32 bits libraries,
> therefore, we need to download them.
>
> [edit<http://debrispublishing.com/wiki/index.php?title=Infrastructure:Installing_PharoVM&action=edit§ion=1>
> ]Get Pharo
>
> You can get the Pharo from http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download.
> To install it you just need to uncompress it.
>
> [edit<http://debrispublishing.com/wiki/index.php?title=Infrastructure:Installing_PharoVM&action=edit§ion=2>
> ]Installing 32 bits needed libraries
>
> To install the minimal needed libraries, we can execute:
> sudo yum install libX11.i686 libX11-devel.i686 mesa-libGL.i686
> mesa-libGL-devel.i686
>
> To test if the VM works, just execute the following with a demo.image:
> ./pharo xxx.image
>
> And there shouldn't be any error in the console.
> [edit<http://debrispublishing.com/wiki/index.php?title=Infrastructure:Installing_PharoVM&action=edit§ion=3>
> ]Installing OpenSSL
>
> If we plan to use Zodiac or SSL we have to install openSSL 32 bits
> libraries. To do that:
> sudo yum install openssl098e.i686 openssl.i686
> sudo cp /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8e /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8
>
> Notice the second line is because otherwise Pharo fails to link to
> /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8. To test if the link is correct, do:
> ldd /opt/pharo/pharoVM/libSqueakSSL.so
>
> And you should see something like:
> libssl.so.0.9.8 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0x00291000)
>
> Otherwise, there is a problem in the link.
>
> Now, all Zodiac and Zinc-Zodiac tests should be green.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Esteban Lorenzano <esteba...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> That's a hard reference, sadly.
>> You need to install 0.9.8 (32bits) in your distribution. I don't know how
>> to do it in fedora, but on ubiuntu is usually plain simple... probably in
>> fedora is also available with the apt-get equivalent tool :)
>>
>> cheers,
>> Esteban
>>
>>
>> On Aug 5, 2013, at 6:43 AM, edwin ancaer <eanc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm running Pharo 2.0 on Fedora 18. I seem to have an issue with
>> libssl.so which on my system is 1.0.1e, while libSquekSSL.so looks for
>> version 0.9.8, as described here:Zodiac mail sending in Pharo
>> smalltalk<http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12293670/zodiac-mail-sending-in-pharo-smalltalk>.
>>
>> Does anyone know how to solve this? Creating a symbolic link from 0.9.8
>> to 1.0.1e does not solve the problem
>>
>> [edwin@ottopedi bin]# ldd libSqueakSSL.so
>> *./libSqueakSSL.so: /lib/libssl.so.0.9.8: version `OPENSSL_0.9.8' not
>> found (required by ./libSqueakSSL.so)*
>> linux-gate.so.1 => (0x001d2000)
>> libssl.so.0.9.8 => /lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0x00161000)
>> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x003a5000)
>> libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x00342000)
>> libkrb5.so.3 => /lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x001d3000)
>> libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x009ec000)
>> libk5crypto.so.3 => /lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x00b76000)
>> libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x002b3000)
>> libcrypto.so.10 => /lib/libcrypto.so.10 (0x0068a000)
>> libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x0087a000)
>> libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x00300000)
>> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4ed07000)
>> libkrb5support.so.0 => /lib/libkrb5support.so.0 (0x00bcd000)
>> libkeyutils.so.1 => /lib/libkeyutils.so.1 (0x00c36000)
>> libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x0091d000)
>> libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x002cc000)
>> libselinux.so.1 => /lib/libselinux.so.1 (0x0097f000)
>> libpcre.so.1 => /lib/libpcre.so.1 (0x0055b000)
>> :
>>
>> Is there anyone who managed to install the version 0.9.8 and 1.0.1e of
>> the openssl rpm on the same machine? Or is nobidy on Fedora 18 using Pharo?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Edwin Ancaer
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Mariano
> http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
>
