Cheers Chris
I've been getting a little concerned with certain aspects of performance
recently. Just a couple of examples off the top of my head were trying
to do a printString on 200000 floats which takes over 3 seconds. If I do
the same in Python it is only 0.25 seconds. Similarly reading 65000
points from a database with the PostgresV2 driver was about 800m/s and
only 40 with psycopg. I'd have to try it again but am pretty sure going
native was faster than OpenDBX as well. I appreciate Pharo is never
going to be able to compete with the static-typed heavyweight languages
but would hope we can get performance at least comparable to other
dynamic languages :) Is it just that some method implementations are in
need of some TLC; more things moved on top of C libraries and primitives
and so forth rather than anything with the VM itself?
- [Pharo-users] Pharo performance Chris
- Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo performance Mariano Martinez Peck
- Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo performance Chris
- Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo performance Mariano Martinez Peck
- Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo performance Mariano Martinez Peck
- Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo performance Sven Van Caekenberghe
- Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo performance Chris
- Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo performance Sven Van Caekenberghe
- Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo performance Yanni Chiu
- Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo perfor... Esteban Lorenzano
- Re: [Pharo-users] Pharo perfor... Sven Van Caekenberghe