I meant stable, but given that I thought Norbert needs to update his local 
copy, I said "latest stable". Confusing :)

Doru


On Jul 25, 2013, at 2:00 PM, Guillermo Polito <guillermopol...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Something I do not understand: "Latest stable" means latest or stable ? :). 
> More specifically, How did you download it?
> 
> Because as far as I knew it was not fixed by Esteban in the VM... But maybe 
> one of the latest merges with Eliot's branch fixed it...
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 July 2013 12:05, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> > The workaround at the image level was needed only until we got the VM
> > working. The details about the workaround are here:
> > https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/10395/
> >
> > I was sure that in the meantime, the problem was solved in the VM as well,
> > but I cannot trace that information. Perhaps it is not. Esteban?
> >
> 
> Last time i discussed with Esteban about it, he said that he don't
> knows where the problem in VM,
> neither me.
> 
> 
> > Cheers,
> > Doru
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Stéphane Ducasse
> > <stephane.duca...@inria.fr> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jul 25, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This was a problem that we also had (when working in Moose), and Esteban
> >> fixed it (first the workaround in the image, and then in the VM). We are
> >> using this VM since some months now and the problem did not resurface.
> >>
> >> That is why I know it is fixed in the latest stable PharoVM.
> >>
> >>
> >> Ok what igor is probably meaning is that we would prefer to get the system
> >> running without having to have a workaround at the image level.
> >>
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Doru
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Doru,
> >>>
> >>> I'm sorry but I was mistaken somehow. I tried always to use the newest
> >>> VM. I just downloaded a new vm a few minutes ago and now I cannot 
> >>> reproduce
> >>> the problem anymore. That doesn't mean it won't appear anymore but I'll 
> >>> work
> >>> with the pharo vm and see if it comes back.
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Norbert
> >>>
> >>> Am 24.07.2013 um 22:46 schrieb Tudor Girba <tu...@tudorgirba.com>:
> >>>
> >>> > Use the latest stable VM. It should solve the problem.
> >>> >
> >>> > Doru
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:34 PM, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Am 24.07.2013 um 18:21 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse
> >>> >> <stephane.duca...@inria.fr>:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> On Jul 24, 2013, at 5:13 PM, Norbert Hartl <norb...@hartl.name>
> >>> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> As I cannot work with the pharo VM right now
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> what is the problem?
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I get the DNU SmallInteger>>add: all the time especially when using
> >>> >> metacello (Using Versionner I get it nearly every attempt to validate 
> >>> >> the
> >>> >> configuration). This occurred already a few times on the list.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> I'm back to use Eliots Cog. But If I open a more recent image it
> >>> >>>> complains about my vm being to old. What does it really check in 
> >>> >>>> order to
> >>> >>>> complain? Some just version string/number parsing? Is it always 
> >>> >>>> sever?
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Norbert
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > www.tudorgirba.com
> >>> >
> >>> > "Quality cannot be an afterthought."
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> www.tudorgirba.com
> >>
> >> "Every thing has its own flow"
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > www.tudorgirba.com
> >
> > "Every thing has its own flow"
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko.
> 
> 

--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Things happen when they happen,
not when you talk about them happening."


Reply via email to