Oh, disk size is NOT the issue ! ;-)
On 12 June 2013 08:12, LogiqueWerks <grshipl...@gmail.com> wrote: > If it is not under 50Mb with min packages + my classes, then I think no > one in the minimalist camp is going to look at my efforts ( this is my > "emit Curl markup" as alternative-to-HTML project for learning Japanese > kanji via personalized mnemonics. ) > > The first image would be to parse Yaml and emit Curl markup ; the second > MAY use Seaside to respond with MIME of text/vnd.curl ... but I still have > so many issues to address ... and no Xvnc installed yet ... and only Python > 2.6.6 so far on this CentOS 6.3 > > My aversion to PCRE is a driving force here , so I have a lot of work to > do ... > > > > On 11 June 2013 07:41, Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 [via Smalltalk] <[hidden > email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4692971&i=0>> wrote: > >> Robert, >> >> What size are you aiming for ? >> >> A normal Pharo image needs between 50 and 100 Mb, with everything >> included. >> >> Not much in my book, are there such small VPS machines today ? >> I run 6 such Images/VM pairs on a AWS EC2 micro instances (~600Mb RAM). >> Linode starts at 1Gb ... >> >> Sven >> >> On 11 Jun 2013, at 12:14, LogiqueWerks <[hidden >> email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4692755&i=0>> >> wrote: >> >> > re: headless Pharo 2.0 >> > >> > I just finished building gst on a tiny VPS site, but I would rather use >> > pharo ... I can get some tips from pharo --help in my SSH console but I >> have >> > a big dev CentOS here in VirtualBox in which to experiment in headless >> > builds if set on the right track ... >> > >> > Does anyone have a tip on starting with a Pharo 2.0 core ? I just need >> > sockets, minimal HTTP and StdOut - I don't think I want Seaside on this >> tiny >> > install ... but I would rather be using an HTTP server in Pharo than in >> Ruby >> > or Python ... I have come to loathe Lighttpd and nginx config silliness >> ... >> > but I could fallback to Ruby Sinatra or merb while I wait ... (the >> > poor-man's Smalltalk ;-) >> > >> > Or should I be looking to strip down a VW image and wait for Pharo 3 ? >> I am >> > scripting with Rebol 2 for now while I wait for rebol3 or Red ... >> > >> > thanks, >> > Robert >> > in a small Atlantic town >> > Canada >> > >> > PS last night I could not see how to run St/X without X to see what mem >> > footprint I would face ! >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/minimal-headless-pharo2-for-CentOS-tp4692753.html >> > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >> discussion below: >> >> http://forum.world.st/minimal-headless-pharo2-for-CentOS-tp4692753p4692755.html >> To unsubscribe from minimal headless pharo2 for CentOS, click here. >> NAML<http://forum.world.st/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> >> > > > ------------------------------ > View this message in context: Re: minimal headless pharo2 for > CentOS<http://forum.world.st/minimal-headless-pharo2-for-CentOS-tp4692753p4692971.html> > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list > archive<http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html>at > Nabble.com. >
