Sorry to hear of this grief ! No ETA does mean that someone has to make a
decision, regardless of what hindsight may or may not eventually show.

Thanks for tackling this ... I rely on reading this mail list to feel "in
the loop" with Pharo ... and I refrain from filtering it !


On 15 May 2013 14:52, Marcus Denker <marcus.den...@inria.fr> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> So now that everything is working… sorry for the mess.
>
> We should have left the gforge infrastructure the last time we had a
> multi-day problem,
> not wait till we get it again.
>
> I think this will be my new principle: second real problem -> I leave. No
> discussions.
> We already saw with the jenkins story just how deadly bad infrastructure
> is.
>
> So what happened was that last Tuesday, the lists (all lists of gforge)
> stopped delivering.
> Why is not clear, seemingly it was not gforge itself but the upstream
> servers  did
> not deliver. Whatever.
> What is clear is that it was completely unclear how long this would take,
> and that we
> needed a solution after nearly a week of waiting.
>
> So we decided to move the lists. Of course with the old lists down, this
> was harder than
> normal (even involved parsing the html to get the subscribers…) but that
> is not important.
>
> Now the problem its hat Mailman does not distinguish between people that
> unsubscribe,
> and those turning off delivery. So there where just a lot of people listed
> with "nomail (U)",
>
> What to do? It was clear that we can't just subscribe lots of people to a
> list that they *actively*
> unsubscribed. So the only option was to skip those by
>         -> unsubscribing them from the old list
>         -> then get the list of subscribers
>         -> put that in the new list.
>
> The only people that will see a bad effect are those using e.g nabble to
> read the list. But those
> would see the new mails, too. The only problem they have is if the want to
> send. So not *that* of
> a big deal.
>
> It seems that we got quite some false positive subscribers anyway in the
> form of people who filtered
> the mails and then with the new list the filter did not work and they
> suddenly saw mails of a long forgotten
> list. We even had the case of people who where "nomail (U)", yet they did
> get mails delivered. How
> that can possibly work, I have  no clue *at all*.
>
> What else is missing (and on my TODO since Sunday/Monday, sorry for not
> yet acting on it):
>
>         -> lists.pharo.org has an empty page and needs to point to the
> list of the lists inttead
>         -> the archive needs to be moved from the old jenkins.
>         -> the (incomplete) archive of the new lists is not working since
> I put it as public.
>
> So… maybe it would have been better to just wait until gforge works again
> and then move… but
> it was just far too long already and not clear when it would be working
> again.
>
>         Marcus
>

Reply via email to