> On 12 Jan 2022, at 17:38, Henrik Sperre Johansen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > True! > It’s a little bit of a naming conundrum, since the «Float» in Pharo is > already 64-bit, but since we’re speaking «native» arrays, > DoubleArray > would be the best, I guess. > > Speaking of, the related new (… to me, anyways) DoubleByte/DoubleWordArray > classes have incorrect definitions in Pharo 9 AFAICT- > variableByte/WordSubclasses, instead of > variableDoubleByte/variableDoubleWordSubclasses…
We finally fixed this in Pharo10 2 days ago: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/9792 <https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/9792> Marcus
