I will do it :)
> On 13 Nov 2019, at 10:05, Marcus Denker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 13 Nov 2019, at 09:04, ducasse <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> In the new implementation of the code formattter I will remove
>> useTraditionalPrecedence.
>> This settings put additional parentheses around binary selector but I find
>> it cumbersome
>>
>> While it may make sense for
>>
>> it turns
>> foo
>> ^ 1 + 2 * 3
>>
>> into
>>
>> foo
>> ^ (1 + 2) * 3
>>
>> foo
>> ^ 1 * 3 + 2
>>
>> foo
>> ^ (1 | 2) % 3
>>
>> foo
>>
>> ^ 1 % 2 | 3
>>
>> So let me know what you think but I will be hard to convince :)
>>
> I vote to remove it.
>
> The RB AST encodes parenthesis information, so that means that we can have
> a pretty printer keeping the parenthesis if they have been added by the
> original author.
>
> Adding new ones makes no sense to me.
>
> So I vote to remove.
>
> Marcus
