I can tell you that it is even hard for me to understand some issue tracker
entries.
We really need to find a way that people add better information.
For me one thing I will try to do: to not use the issue tracker anymore as my
private TODO list.
This means that the “I should maybe look into this but i have no time to even
add a description”
entries are now in my private list and if I make an issue on the issue tracker
I will try to write it
in a way that it explains how someone else could fix it.
Marcus
> On 4 Nov 2019, at 07:16, Hernán Morales Durand <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> This is it.
>
> Finally this problem is spotted. It's been years since I read a Pharo issue
> because of their targeted "narrative" to a bunch of 5 - 10 people who share a
> daily operational knowledge. This is more severe with the VM front.
>
> Other communities, like R, use a lot minimum reproducible example (MRE). So
> nothing new should be invented here, if Pharo just could adopt one of the
> standard practices...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hernán
>
>
>
> El mar., 29 oct. 2019 a las 8:56, Torsten Bergmann (<[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>>) escribió:
> +1000
>
> I've seen this several times that issues where just a short title only
> "wizards" were able to understand
>
> The "Full description requires time" is not an argument here. We all should
> get more professional
> and disciplined here - so anyone is able to reproduce and understand what an
> issue is about. This will
> also increase the trust into Pharo and its dev process...
>
> Bye
> T.
