On Sunday 12 March 2006 11:29, chester c young wrote:
> --- Robert Paulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One problem with the above is that the list of attributes is fixed. I
> > am looking for a way to assign new, previously undefined, attributes
>
> to
>
> > items without changing the table structure. Is it ever appropriate to
>
> do
>
> > the following?
> > ...
>
> There are two ways for extending tables, one static and one dynamic.
>
> Your scheme is dynamic. You will have problems with typing and
> performance. What you really want is to be able to list more
> attributes, similar to attributes attached to a tag in html.
>
> If you want a base table that has, under different specified
> conditions, extra attributes, there are better techniques. IMHO the
> best solution is, for each condition, create a table containing the
> primary table's id plus the extra attributes; then join that to the
> base table
So, to be sure I understand, something like ...
item
item_id int
name char
cond_one
cond_one_id int
cond_one_descr char
item_id int
attribute_a char
attribute_b int
cond_two
cond_two_id int
cond_two_descr char
item_id int
attribute_c bool
attribute_d date
etc...
This still requires me to modify the overall database structure but not the
original item table. As my reward :) I get to use any type I choose for each
new attribute.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
