Kaloyan Iliev Iliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I say in my previous letter I am using 7.2.3. If you wish I can show
> you the query and the result to see for yourself, that there is
> something wrong. It just don't order the overall result but the separate
> results of the both subqueries.
Quite honestly, I don't believe it. In 7.2 I get
regression=# explain select * from tenk1 a union all select * from tenk1 b order by
unique1;
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Sort (cost=3128.28..3128.28 rows=20000 width=148)
-> Append (cost=0.00..760.00 rows=20000 width=148)
-> Subquery Scan *SELECT* 1 (cost=0.00..380.00 rows=10000 width=148)
-> Seq Scan on tenk1 a (cost=0.00..380.00 rows=10000 width=148)
-> Subquery Scan *SELECT* 2 (cost=0.00..380.00 rows=10000 width=148)
-> Seq Scan on tenk1 b (cost=0.00..380.00 rows=10000 width=148)
EXPLAIN
and as you can see there's only one sort step being applied to the union
result.
Now if EXPLAIN shows you a different sorting structure for your query,
then I'd be interested to see the exact query and the EXPLAIN output.
But what I think is that you are misinterpreting the sorting result you
get. If you are using a non-C locale you may be seeing some pretty
weird sorting rules :-(
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
