Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2001 03:46, Tom Lane wrote:
>> You can't. This is one of the many deficiencies of large objects.
> But now that the limit on row length / size has gone away, and that the new
> BYTEA type has appeared, it would seem that the need for large objects is
> redundant. Someone with more knowledge than I might like to comment.
Indeed, large objects are looking rather dinosaurian to me. TOASTed
fields seem a far more natural and flexible way of dealing with large
values.
We still have some work to do on TOASTed fields --- for example, there's
no API to read or write segments of a TOASTed field, as there is for
large objects. And it'd be nice to be able to store or retrieve BYTEA
values without worrying about quoting/escaping problems. But it makes
a lot more sense to expend effort on fixing those issues than it does
to expend effort on improving support for large objects. IMHO anyway.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
