Feeling a little sorry about replying you later.
Then, I want to say so many thanks for this advice, cause we pointed our
jobserver to the master directly and then the performance issues resolved. My
client is so curious that why pgpool doesn't support so welcome platform like
java. Hoping it can get improved in the following versions.
So, besides pgpool, do you have any other solutions for postgresql cluster?
Thanks a lot,Cora
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 06:47:13 -0700
From: ml-node+s1045698n5798972...@n5.nabble.com
To: machengcheng...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: performance degradation after launching postgres cluster using
pgpool-II
> Before starting the cluster, one bulk updates through java code would
cost
> about 1 hour to finish, but then it would take twice amount of time.
pgpool-II is not very good at handling extended protocol (mostly used
in Java). If you need to execute large updates, you'd better to
connect to PostgreSQL directly. Note that there's no problem that some
sessions connect via pgpool-II, while others directly connect
PostgreSQL.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list ([hidden email])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
discussion below:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/performance-degradation-after-launching-postgres-cluster-using-pgpool-II-tp5797953p5798972.html
To unsubscribe from performance degradation after launching
postgres cluster using pgpool-II, click here.
NAML
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/performance-degradation-after-launching-postgres-cluster-using-pgpool-II-tp5797953p5799639.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
