Den 13/03/2013 kl. 19.15 skrev Vasilis Ventirozos <v.ventiro...@gmail.com>:
> raid0 tends to linear scaling so 3 of them should give something close to > 300% increased write speed. So i would say 1. but make sure you test your > configuration as soon as you can with bonnie++ or something similar > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Niels Kristian Schjødt > <nielskrist...@autouncle.com> wrote: > I have a server with 32GB ram, one intel E3-1245 and four 15k SAS disks with > a BB LSI MegaRaid controller. I wan't the optimal performance for my server, > which will be pretty write heavy at times, and less optimized for redundancy, > as my data is not very crucial and I will be running a streaming replication > along side. > > Now what would you prefer: > > 1) 3 disks in RAID 0 containing PGDATA + 1 containing SYSTEM and WAL > 2) All four in RAID 10 containing both PGDATA, SYSTEM AND WAL > 3) 2 disks in RAID 1 containing PGDATA + 2 disks in RAID 1 containing SYSTEM > and WAL > 4) Something different? A 5. option could also be to simply have all 4 disk in a RAID 0 containing all PGDATA, SYSTEM and WAL > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance >
