Actually that last paragraph doesn't make much sense. Please ignore it.
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Nikolas Everett <nik9...@gmail.com> wrote: > New news - the hot slave seems to be performing as expected with no long > pauses. > > It looks like we're using an archive_timeout of 60 seconds and default > checkout_timeout and checkpoint_completion_target. I didn't do any of the > research on this. It seems like we're asking postgres to clear all of the > dirty buffers every 60 seconds. With 48 gigs of shared buffers we could > have quite a few buffers to clear. Is there some place I could check on > how all that is going? > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Nikolas Everett <nik9...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> p > > >
