On 09/26/2012 16:14, FFW_Rude wrote:
Thank for you answer.shared_buffer is at 24Mb effective_cache_size at 2048Mb What do you mean properly ? That's not really helping a novice...
from my previous mail:before looking further, please configure shared_buffers and effective_cache_size properly, it's fundamental you'll probably need to raise SHMALL/SHMMAX, take a look at: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/kernel-resources.html for 4GB of RAM I would start with shared_buffers to 512MB and effective_cache_size to 2GB
-- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Same-query-doing-slow-then-quick-tp5725486p5725505.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-- No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
<<attachment: jcigar.vcf>>
-- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
