On 08/04/2011 04:54 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
it peaked at 2x physical cores, where it ended up being 60%
faster than true cores.
Not sure I understand the terminology here -- "physical cores" is
counting HT or not?
No. So with a dual X5675, that's 12 cores. My numbers peaked at
24-concurrency. At that concurrency, HT was 60% faster than non-HT.
Sorry if I mixed my terminology. :)
--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-676-8870
stho...@peak6.com
______________________________________________
See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer.php
for terms and conditions related to this email
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
