On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 15:59, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 21:19, David Jarvis <thanga...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I prefer to_timestamp and to_date over the more verbose construct_timestamp. > >> Yeah, I agree with that. > > Those names are already taken. It will cause confusion (of both people > and machines) if you try to overload them with this.
Fair enough. How about something like make_timestamp? It's at least shorter and easier than construct :-) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
