Jori,
What is the PostgreSQL
version/shared_buffers/work_mem/effective_cache_size/default_statistics_target?
Are the statistics for the table up to date? (Run analyze verbose <tablename>
to update them.) Table and index structure would be nice to know, too.
If all else fails you can set enable_seqscan = off for the session, but that is
a Big Hammer for what is probably a smaller problem.
Bob Lunney
--- On Wed, 6/2/10, Jori Jovanovich <j...@dimensiology.com> wrote:
From: Jori Jovanovich <j...@dimensiology.com>
Subject: [PERFORM] SELECT ignoring index even though ORDER BY and LIMIT present
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Date: Wednesday, June 2, 2010, 4:28 PM
hi,
I have a problem space where the main goal is to search backward in time for
events. Time can go back very far into the past, and so the
table can get quite large. However, the vast majority of queries are all
satisfied by relatively recent data. I have an index on the row creation date
and I would like almost all of my queries to have a query plan looking
something like:
Limit ... -> Index Scan Backward using server_timestamp_idx on events
(cost=0.00..623055.91 rows=8695 width=177)
...
However, PostgreSQL frequently tries to do a full table scan. Often what
controls whether a scan is performed or not is dependent on the size of the
LIMIT and how detailed the WHERE clause is. In practice, the scan is always
the wrong answer for my use cases (where "always" is defined to be >99.9%).
Some examples:
(1) A sample query that devolves to a full table scan
EXPLAIN
SELECT events.id, events.client_duration, events.message, events.created_by,
events.source, events.type, events.event, events.environment,
events.server_timestamp, events.session_id, events.reference,
events.client_uuid FROM events
WHERE client_uuid ~* E'^foo bar so what' ORDER BY server_timestamp DESC
LIMIT 20; QUERY PLAN (BAD!)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Limit
(cost=363278.56..363278.61 rows=20 width=177)
-> Sort (cost=363278.56..363278.62 rows=24 width=177) Sort Key:
server_timestamp
-> Seq Scan on events (cost=0.00..363278.01 rows=24 width=177)
Filter: (client_uuid ~* '^foo bar so what'::text)
(2) Making the query faster by making the string match LESS specific (odd,
seems like it should be MORE)
EXPLAIN
SELECT events.id, events.client_duration, events.message, events.created_by,
events.source, events.type, events.event, events.environment,
events.server_timestamp, events.session_id, events.reference,
events.client_uuid FROM events
WHERE client_uuid ~* E'^foo' ORDER BY server_timestamp DESC
LIMIT 20; QUERY PLAN (GOOD!)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Limit
(cost=0.00..1433.14 rows=20 width=177) -> Index Scan Backward using
server_timestamp_idx on events (cost=0.00..623055.91 rows=8695 width=177)
Filter: (client_uuid ~* '^foo'::text)
(3) Alternatively making the query faster by using a smaller limit
EXPLAIN
SELECT events.id, events.client_duration, events.message, events.created_by,
events.source, events.type, events.event, events.environment,
events.server_timestamp, events.session_id, events.reference,
events.client_uuid FROM events
WHERE client_uuid ~* E'^foo bar so what' ORDER BY server_timestamp DESC
LIMIT 10;
QUERY PLAN (GOOD!)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=0.00..259606.63 rows=10 width=177) -> Index Scan Backward
using server_timestamp_idx on events (cost=0.00..623055.91 rows=24 width=177)
Filter: (client_uuid ~* '^foo bar so what'::text)
I find myself wishing I could just put a SQL HINT on the query to force the
index to be used but I understand that HINTs are considered harmful and are
therefore not provided for PostgreSQL, so what is the recommended way to solve
this?
thank you very much
