Jochen Erwied escribió: > Maybe using 'numeric(19)' instead of bigint is an alternative. I actually > don't know how these numbers are stored internally (some kind of BCD, or as > base-100?), but IMHO they should be faster than strings, although not as > fast as 'native' types.
base 10000 in the current implementation -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
