Tom Lane wrote:
> Karl Denninger <k...@denninger.net> writes:
>   
>> That doesn't help in this case as the returned set will typically be
>> quite large, with the condition typically being valid on anywhere from
>> 10-80% of the returned tuples.
>>     
>
> In that case you'd be wasting your time to get it to use an index
> for the condition anyway.  Maybe you need to take a step back and
> look at the query as a whole rather than focus on this particular
> condition.
>
>                       regards, tom lane
>
>   
The query, sans this condition, is extremely fast and contains a LOT of
other conditions (none of which cause trouble.)

It is only attempting to filter the returned tuples on the permission
bit(s) involved that cause trouble.

-- Karl

<<attachment: karl.vcf>>

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

Reply via email to