Tom Lane wrote: > Karl Denninger <k...@denninger.net> writes: > >> That doesn't help in this case as the returned set will typically be >> quite large, with the condition typically being valid on anywhere from >> 10-80% of the returned tuples. >> > > In that case you'd be wasting your time to get it to use an index > for the condition anyway. Maybe you need to take a step back and > look at the query as a whole rather than focus on this particular > condition. > > regards, tom lane > > The query, sans this condition, is extremely fast and contains a LOT of other conditions (none of which cause trouble.)
It is only attempting to filter the returned tuples on the permission bit(s) involved that cause trouble. -- Karl
<<attachment: karl.vcf>>
-- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance