Is there any interest in adding that (continual/automatic cluster order maintenance) to a future release?
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Scott Carey<sc...@richrelevance.com> wrote: > If you have a lot of insert/update/delete activity on a table fillfactor can > help. > > I don’t believe that postgres will try and maintain the table in the cluster > order however. > > > On 7/15/09 8:04 AM, "Ibrahim Harrani" <ibrahim.harr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > thanks for your suggestion. > Is there any benefit of setting fillfactor to 70 or 80 on this table? > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Scott Marlowe<scott.marl...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> As another poster pointed out, you cluster on ONE index and one index >> only. However, you can cluster on a multi-column index. >> > > -- > Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance > > -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
