Brian Cox <brian....@ca.com> writes:
> Here's the explain and a current strace and lsof. The strace shows even
> less I/O activity.
> cemdb=# explain select * from ts_stats_transetgroup_user_daily a where
> a.ts_id in (select b.ts_id from ts_stats_transetgroup_user_daily
> b,ts_stats_transet_user_interval c, ts_transetgroup_transets_map m where
> b.ts_transet_group_id = m.ts_transet_group_id and
> m.ts_transet_incarnation_id = c.ts_transet_incarnation_id and
> c.ts_user_incarnation_id = b.ts_user_incarnation_id and
> c.ts_interval_start_time >= '2009-6-16 01:00' and
> c.ts_interval_start_time < '2009-6-16 02:00');
Um, are you sure that is the query that PID 7397 is running? It doesn't
match your previous pg_stat_activity printout, nor do I see anything
about partitioning by PKs.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
