>>> "Fernando Hevia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a table with over 30 million rows. Performance was dropping steadily > so I moved old data not needed online to an historic table. Now the table > has about 14 million rows. I don't need the disk space returned to the OS > but I do need to improve performance. Will a plain vacuum do or is a vacuum > full necessary? > *Would a vacuum full improve performance at all? If this database can be out of production for long enough to run it (possibly a few hours, depending on hardware, configuration, table width, indexes) your best option might be to CLUSTER and ANALYZE the table. It gets more complicated if you can't tolerate down-time. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
