Re: [PERFORM] Updates on large tables are extremely slow

[Yves Vindevogel]

Ok, if all 21 are affected, I can understand the problem.
But allow me to say that this is a "functional error"

On 13 Jun 2005, at 18:02, Richard Huxton wrote:

Yves Vindevogel wrote:

I forgot cc
Begin forwarded message:

From: Yves Vindevogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon 13 Jun 2005 17:45:19 CEST
To: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Updates on large tables are extremely slow

Yes, but if I update one column, why should PG update 21 indexes ?
There's only one index affected !

No - all 21 are affected. MVCC creates a new row on disk.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

Met vriendelijke groeten,
Bien à vous,
Kind regards,

Yves Vindevogel
Implements

<<inline: Pasted Graphic 2.tiff>>

Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mobile: +32 (478) 80 82 91

Kempische Steenweg 206 - 3500 Hasselt - Tel-Fax: +32 (11) 43 55 76

Web: http://www.implements.be
<x-tad-smaller>
First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win.
Mahatma Ghandi.</x-tad-smaller>

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq