On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:47:57AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote: >> Must admit this puzzles me. Are you saying you can't saturate your disk I/O? >> Or >> are you saying other DBMS store records in 0.5 to 0.2 times less space than >> PG? > I don't know what he's talking about either. Perhaps he's thinking of people > who haven't been running vacuum enough?
I'm a bit unsure -- should counting ~3 million rows (no OIDs, PG 7.4, everything in cache, 32-byte rows) take ~3500ms on an Athlon 64 2800+? /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
