Looking for help on storing and retrieving the personal data as masked. Any 
references and implementation details would help

> On 10 Oct 2025, at 3:24 AM, Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 2:05 AM Jon Emord <[email protected]> wrote:
>> My expectation is that the following two queries would have roughly the same 
>> performance.
>> They both use the same index only scans and return the same 100 rows of data.
>> The main difference I see in the explain output is that the row wise 
>> comparison has 3,000 times
>> the shared buffer hits, but it is unclear why there would need to be more 
>> hits.
> 
> I agree that this doesn't make sense.
> 
> The problem here is that the row compare condition that terminates the
> scan (namely "(ROW(data_model_id, primary_key) <= ROW(123,
> 'DEF'::text))") was unable to recognize that we've reached the end of
> all matching tuples upon reaching the first tuple that's > "(123,
> 'DEF')". The scan would only terminate upon reaching the first tuple
> whose data_model_id was > 123. Which (in this particular case) meant
> that the scan read far more index leaf pages than necessary. Note that
> this wouldn't have mattered very much if there weren't so many
> irrelevant tuples that were "data_model_id = 123 AND > '(123, 'DEF')'"
> -- but there were.
> 
> I fixed this problem in passing, in the context of a bug fix that went
> into Postgres 18 (see commit bd3f59fd, in particular the part about
> marking lower-order subkeys as required to continue the scan,
> described towards the end of the commit message). You should look into
> upgrading to Postgres 18 if this issue is important to you.
> 
> --
> Peter Geoghegan
> 
> 

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Note: 
Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this 
message and 
may be subject to legal privilege. Access to this e-mail by 
anyone other 
than the intended is unauthorised. If you are not the 
intended recipient 
(or responsible for delivery of the message to such 
person), you may not 
use, copy, distribute or deliver to anyone this 
message (or any part of 
its contents ) or take any action in reliance on
 it. In such case, you 
should destroy this message, and notify us 
immediately. If you have 
received this email in error, please notify us 
immediately by e-mail or 
telephone and delete the e-mail from any 
computer. The integrity and 
security of e-mail communication cannot be guaranteed via the public 
Internet as information can be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, 
arrive late or contain viruses. Boson Systems Pvt. Ltd. hereby disclaims 
any liability for the correct and complete transmission of information 
contained in e-mail messages or for any delay in its receipt. If 
verification of the content of any e-mail communication is required, please 
request a hard copy version of the e-mail from the original sender. If you 
or your employer does not consent to internet e-mail 
messages of this 
kind, please notify us immediately. All reasonable 
precautions have been 
taken to ensure no viruses are present in this 
e-mail. As our company 
cannot accept responsibility for any loss or 
damage arising from the use 
of this e-mail or attachments we recommend 
that you subject these to your 
virus checking procedures prior to use. 
The views, opinions, conclusions 
and other informations expressed in 
this electronic mail are not given or 
endorsed by the company unless 
otherwise indicated by an authorized 
representative independent of this 
message.



Reply via email to