James Addison <j...@jp-hosting.net> writes:
> In other words: each additional strpos(value, ...) expression
> increased the evaluation time by a similar, significant duration of
> two seconds. This seems to confirm the basis that each expression is
> currently evaluated separately, by an independent read from the input
> text.
That's correct. We have not felt a need to try to identify duplicate
function calls: the cost of looking for them would seldom be repaid,
so that such an optimization would be a net loss for most people.
(In your example, they're not even truly duplicates.)
> I'd like to suggest the introduction of a documented multiple string
> matching algorithm[1], to yield results for each of multiple strpos
> calls while only reading through their common input text at-most once.
This seems like something with a pretty narrow audience. I'd suggest
building it as an extension rather than trying to persuade people
it belongs in core Postgres.
regards, tom lane
