________________________________ From: Hannu Krosing <han...@google.com> To: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamf...@gmail.com> Cc: Lars Aksel Opsahl <lars.ops...@nibio.no>; Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>; Christophe Pettus <x...@thebuild.com>; pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org> Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and a Catch-22 Issue related to dead rows
If there are unremovable rows it usually also means that index-only scan degrades to index-scan-with-visibility-checks-in-tables. I think the ask is to be able to remove the recently dead rows that are not visible in any current snapshot and can never become visible to any future snapshot, Something that Tom described as currently not easily doable above. Maybe we could figure out a way for long-running transactions to upload their snapshot set to some meta-vacuum process which can use it to determine which rows fall into that category. In this way the change would affect only the long-running transactions and if we do it onl maybe once a minute it should not be too heavy overhead even for these transactions. Hi This is tested but only works when the load is very low. To fix the problem with xmin we use this https://gitlab.com/nibioopensource/postgres_execute_parallel to start the jobs, but the control is returned to the caller at given intervals, and the caller also does a commit and gets a new snapshot and xmin is updated. If all jobs done are done the caller may start a new batch of jobs. One of the 750 jobs takes for hours to remove (https://postgis.net/docs/ST_RemEdgeNewFace.html) almost 30.000 edges. I do this in a loop takes around 500 edges in every loop. If the time used is to long I forced a commit in this loop in addition to the analyze I do. Adding the commit really helps on execution time but only when running a very few jobs in parallel. With this new commit I could see that dead rows were removed. The issue with the new commit in the loop where I remove edges is that it becomes problem when many treads run parallel related to subtransactions per transaction like discussed here https://postgrespro.com/list/thread-id/2478202 and many other threads. Almost like a catch 22, fixing the dead rows problem is causing a new bigger problem. So to solve problems with subtransactions per transaction I can make new joblist for removing edges also, but that makes things more complicated. Thanks Lars.
