Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> writes:
> This is not surprising. There is a performance regression that started
> in glibc 2.21 with regard to sorting unicode. Test with RHEL 7.x (glibc
> 2.17) and I bet you will see comparable results to ICU. The best answer
> in the long term, IMHO, is likely to use the new built-in collation just
> released in Postgres 17.
It seems unrelated to unicode though --- I also reproduced the issue
in a database with LATIN1 encoding.
Whatever, it is pretty awful, but the place to be complaining to
is the glibc maintainers. Not much we can do about it.
regards, tom lane
