In AWS RDS performance insights the client writes is high and the api
which receives data on the mobile side is slow during load test.
On Tue, 8 Jun 2021, 19:03 Ayub Khan, <ayub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I checked all the indexes are defined on the tables however the query
> seems slow, below is the plan. Can any one give any pointers to verify ?
>
> SELECT a.menu_item_id, a.menu_item_name, a.menu_item_category_id,
> b.menu_item_category_desc, c.menu_item_variant_id,
> c.menu_item_variant_type_id, c.price, c.size_id,
> c.parent_menu_item_variant_id, d.menu_item_variant_type_desc, e.size_desc,
> f.currency_code, a.image, a.mark_id, m.mark_name
>
> FROM menu_item_category AS b, menu_item_variant AS c, menu_item_variant_type
> AS d, item_size AS e, restaurant AS f, menu_item AS a
>
> LEFT OUTER JOIN mark AS m ON (a.mark_id = m.mark_id) WHERE
> a.menu_item_category_id = b.menu_item_category_id AND a.menu_item_id =
> c.menu_item_id AND c.menu_item_variant_type_id = d.menu_item_variant_type_id
> AND d.is_hidden = 'false' AND c.size_id = e.size_id AND a.restaurant_id =
> f.restaurant_id AND f.restaurant_id = 1528 AND (a.menu_item_category_id =
> NULL OR NULL IS NULL)
>
> AND c.menu_item_variant_id = (SELECT min(menu_item_variant_id) FROM
> menu_item_variant WHERE menu_item_id = a.menu_item_id AND deleted = 'N' limit
> 1) AND a.active = 'Y'
> AND (CONCAT_WS('', ',', a.hidden_branch_ids, ',') NOT LIKE CONCAT_WS('',
> '%,4191,%') OR NULL IS NULL)
> AND is_menu_item_available(a.menu_item_id, 'Y') = 'Y'
>
> ORDER BY a.row_order, menu_item_id;
>
>
> below is the plan
>
>
> Sort (cost=189.27..189.27 rows=1 width=152) (actual time=5.876..5.885
> rows=89 loops=1)
> " Sort Key: a.row_order, a.menu_item_id"
> Sort Method: quicksort Memory: 48kB
> -> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=5.19..189.26 rows=1 width=152) (actual
> time=0.188..5.809 rows=89 loops=1)
> Join Filter: (a.mark_id = m.mark_id)
> Rows Removed by Join Filter: 267
> -> Nested Loop (cost=5.19..188.19 rows=1 width=148) (actual
> time=0.181..5.629 rows=89 loops=1)
> -> Nested Loop (cost=4.90..185.88 rows=1 width=152) (actual
> time=0.174..5.443 rows=89 loops=1)
> -> Nested Loop (cost=4.61..185.57 rows=1 width=144)
> (actual time=0.168..5.272 rows=89 loops=1)
> -> Nested Loop (cost=4.32..185.25 rows=1
> width=136) (actual time=0.162..5.066 rows=89 loops=1)
> -> Nested Loop (cost=0.71..179.62 rows=1
> width=99) (actual time=0.137..3.986 rows=89 loops=1)
> -> Index Scan using
> menu_item_restaurant_id on menu_item a (cost=0.42..177.31 rows=1 width=87)
> (actual time=0.130..3.769 rows=89 loops=1)
> Index Cond: (restaurant_id = 1528)
> " Filter: ((active = 'Y'::bpchar)
> AND (is_menu_item_available(menu_item_id, 'Y'::bpchar) = 'Y'::bpchar))"
> Rows Removed by Filter: 194
> -> Index Scan using
> menu_item_category_pk on menu_item_category b (cost=0.29..2.31 rows=1
> width=20) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=1 loops=89)
> Index Cond:
> (menu_item_category_id = a.menu_item_category_id)
> -> Index Scan using menu_item_variant_pk on
> menu_item_variant c (cost=3.60..5.62 rows=1 width=45) (actual
> time=0.002..0.002 rows=1 loops=89)
> Index Cond: (menu_item_variant_id =
> (SubPlan 1))
> Filter: (a.menu_item_id = menu_item_id)
> SubPlan 1
> -> Limit (cost=3.17..3.18 rows=1
> width=8) (actual time=0.009..0.009 rows=1 loops=89)
> -> Aggregate (cost=3.17..3.18
> rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.008..0.008 rows=1 loops=89)
> -> Index Scan using
> "idx$$_023a0001" on menu_item_variant (cost=0.43..3.15 rows=8 width=8)
> (actual time=0.004..0.007 rows=7 loops=89)
> Index Cond:
> (menu_item_id = a.menu_item_id)
> Filter: (deleted =
> 'N'::bpchar)
> Rows Removed by
> Filter: 4
> -> Index Scan using menu_item_variant_type_pk on
> menu_item_variant_type d (cost=0.29..0.31 rows=1 width=16) (actual
> time=0.002..0.002 rows=1 loops=89)
> Index Cond: (menu_item_variant_type_id =
> c.menu_item_variant_type_id)
> Filter: ((is_hidden)::text = 'false'::text)
> -> Index Scan using size_pk on item_size e
> (cost=0.29..0.31 rows=1 width=16) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=1 loops=89)
> Index Cond: (size_id = c.size_id)
> -> Index Scan using "restaurant_idx$$_274b003d" on restaurant
> f (cost=0.29..2.30 rows=1 width=12) (actual time=0.001..0.002 rows=1
> loops=89)
> Index Cond: (restaurant_id = 1528)
> -> Seq Scan on mark m (cost=0.00..1.03 rows=3 width=12) (actual
> time=0.000..0.001 rows=3 loops=89)
> Planning Time: 1.510 ms
> Execution Time: 5.972 ms
>
>
